WoW Stuff - Eye of the Storm

Total ratings: 141	Rate this topic!
Total comments: 11	Add a comment!

Total sub-topics: 0

Average

2.7

Score

8		6%
20		14%
52		37%
37		26%
24		17%

Rate this topic : From Uncommon (1) to Artifact (5)
Mouseover images for more information, click to vote

Pages :: 1

-1

Played right, this is a quick and pretty fun BG. Had some good times here.

Gruull, on October 11, 2009 12:36:05

[ Reply ]

There's alot that come from. Personally im a fan of knocking people off :)

Katsumo, on October 13, 2009 08:51:08

[ Reply ]

Probably my fav BG at the moment

Raigirin, on October 18, 2009 09:53:50

[ Reply ]

Its fun for sure and quick.

Massdesign, on October 23, 2009 04:52:12

[ Reply ]

Wouldn't be so bad if more people played it like AB and not like WSG.

RuzGofDI, on October 23, 2009 05:08:32

[ Reply ]

i can not effectively express my deep-seething hatred of this BG

Gunstrak, on October 23, 2009 08:13:18 (edited once)

[ Reply ]

Somehow I never could get into this one. Something just never felt right about it. Being a patchwork of WSG and AB, I feel like this battleground never really got its own identity.

Imago, on October 23, 2009 12:24:15

[ Reply ]

-1

EotS stands for Eye of the Suck.

Feeniks, on October 23, 2009 09:27:38

[ Reply ]

-1

EotS was never going to be popular and blizzard should have known that from the start. It's just a combo of 2 other bgs, not a good place to start.

Moroan, on October 24, 2009 02:39:43 (edited once)

[ Reply ]

The BG itself I give a 5/5 but it's due to people playing it like WSG instead of AB I have to give it a 4/5

CrazyPally, on October 25, 2009 03:12:37

[ Reply ]

Dear god no!
On Darkspear EU the alliance NEVER wins this thing! they all get 'Flag horny' and waste time and effort grabbing the flag instead of bases for example:

*allys capture flag*
Me: Great job guys! but we ONLY HAVE ONE F***ING BASE!!

Typical EotS match on DS right there -_-;

Bart95, on June 16, 2010 12:37:58

[ Reply ]

Pages :: 1

	NEW
			Type your new comment here. This will be a new comment.